NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs Moore Threads MTT S4000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 and 48GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Boost Clock1665MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 450W)
Moore Threads MTT S4000 's Advantages
More VRAM (48GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
7296 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650
2.984 TFLOPS
Moore Threads MTT S4000
+723%
24.58 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2019
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 16
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1485 MHz
Base Clock
1500 MHz
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
768.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
64
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
8192
56
TMUs
512
32
ROPs
512
-
Tensor Cores
128
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
53.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
768.0 GPixel/s
93.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
768.0 GTexel/s
5.967 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
49.15 TFLOPS
2.984 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
24.58 TFLOPS
93.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
384.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
450W
250 W
Suggested PSU
850 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
MTT Gen 2
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
12 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
22 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.4
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.5
