NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 and 3GB VRAM GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 79% (1665MHz vs 928MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
Lower TDP (75W vs 250W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.6GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
1984 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650
2.984 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample
+79%
5.345 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2019
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 16
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1485 MHz
Base Clock
875 MHz
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
928 MHz
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
1753 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
336.6GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
2880
56
TMUs
240
32
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
53.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
55.68 GPixel/s
93.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
222.7 GTexel/s
5.967 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.984 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.345 TFLOPS
93.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
222.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
GK180
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
GK180-425-A1
Turing
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.175
7.5
CUDA
3.5
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
