NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs ATI FirePro V8800
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 and 2GB VRAM FirePro V8800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Released 9 years late
Boost Clock1665MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (75W vs 208W)
ATI FirePro V8800 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
704 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650
+13%
2.984 TFLOPS
FirePro V8800
2.64 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2019
Release Date
Apr 2010
GeForce 16
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1485 MHz
Base Clock
-
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
147.2GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
20
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
1600
56
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
53.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
93.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
66.00 GTexel/s
5.967 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.984 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.640 TFLOPS
93.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
528.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
208W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.1
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
Cypress
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
Cypress XT GL
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.0
