Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 OEM

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 and 1536MB VRAM GeForce GT 230 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Released 10 years late
Boost Clock1665MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 24.00GB/s)
800 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 +1143%
2.984 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 230 OEM
0.24 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2019
Release Date
Apr 2009
GeForce 16
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1485 MHz
Base Clock
-
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
24.00GB/s

Render Config

14
SM Count
12
-
Compute Units
-
896
Shading Units
96
56
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
12
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
48 KB

Theoretical Performance

53.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.000 GPixel/s
93.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
5.967 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.984 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
240.0 GFLOPS
93.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
G92B
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
G92-159-B1
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
260 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy