NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 and 256MB VRAM GeForce 8400 GS to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Released 12 years late
Boost Clock1665MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
880 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650
+10189%
2.984 TFLOPS
GeForce 8400 GS
0.029 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GTX 1650
+866%
3566
GeForce 8400 GS
369
Graphics Card
Apr 2019
Release Date
Apr 2007
GeForce 16
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1485 MHz
Base Clock
-
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
2
896
Shading Units
16
56
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
53.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.836 GPixel/s
93.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.672 GTexel/s
5.967 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.984 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
29.38 GFLOPS
93.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
75W
TDP
40W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
G86
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
G86-213-A2
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
80 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
