NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA A40 PCIe
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 and 48GB VRAM A40 PCIe to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 300W)
NVIDIA A40 PCIe 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 5% (1740MHz vs 1665MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (695.8GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
9856 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650
2.984 TFLOPS
A40 PCIe
+1154%
37.42 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2019
Release Date
Oct 2020
GeForce 16
Generation
Tesla
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1485 MHz
Base Clock
1305 MHz
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
1740 MHz
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
1812 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
695.8GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
84
896
Shading Units
10752
56
TMUs
336
32
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
336
-
RT Cores
84
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
53.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
194.9 GPixel/s
93.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
584.6 GTexel/s
5.967 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
37.42 TFLOPS
2.984 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
37.42 TFLOPS
93.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
584.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
300W
250 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
GA102
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
12 nm
Process Size
8 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
8.6
6.6
Shader Model
6.6
