Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 and 256MB VRAM Radeon X1600 PRO AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 12.48GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (41W vs 90W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2020
Release Date
Oct 2007
GeForce 16
Generation
Radeon R500 AGP
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 8x

Clock Speeds

1410 MHz
Base Clock
-
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
390 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.48GB/s

Render Config

14
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
896
Shading Units
-
56
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

TU106
GPU Name
RV530
TU106-125-KAB-A1
GPU Variant
RV530 PRO (215CADAKA24FG)
Turing
Architecture
R500
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
90 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
0.157 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
150 mm²

Board Design

90W
TDP
41W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
Floppy

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy