NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q vs Intel Arc A350M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q and 4GB VRAM Arc A350M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Intel Arc A350M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 2% (1150MHz vs 1125MHz)
Lower TDP (25W vs 30W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q
+30%
2.304 TFLOPS
Arc A350M
1.766 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q
+6%
2932
Arc A350M
2749
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q
1318
Arc A350M
+1%
1336
Blender
GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q
+15%
453
Arc A350M
392
Graphics Card
Apr 2020
Release Date
Mar 2022
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
Alchemist
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
930 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
1125 MHz
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
768
64
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
6
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
36.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.60 GPixel/s
72.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
55.20 GTexel/s
4.608 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
3.533 TFLOPS
2.304 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.766 TFLOPS
72.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
441.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
30W
TDP
25W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
DG2-128
N18P-G61-MP2
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Turing
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
6 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.6
