NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 vs Moore Threads MTT S3000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 and 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S3000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 's Advantages
Boost Clock1590MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 250W)
Moore Threads MTT S3000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
3200 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6
2.849 TFLOPS
Moore Threads MTT S3000
+446%
15.56 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2020
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 16
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1410 MHz
Base Clock
1900 MHz
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
0 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
32
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
4096
56
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
256
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
486.4 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
486.4 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
31.13 TFLOPS
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
15.56 TFLOPS
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
243.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
MTT Gen 2
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
12 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
22 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.4
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.5
