Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 vs Intel H3C XG310

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 vs Intel H3C XG310

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 and 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 3% (1590MHz vs 1550MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 300W)
Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 +19%
2.849 TFLOPS
H3C XG310
2.381 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Apr 2020
Release Date
Nov 2020
GeForce 16
Generation
H3C Graphics
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1410 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
2133 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
LPDDR4X
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
68.26GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
768
56
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.20 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
74.40 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.762 TFLOPS
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.381 TFLOPS
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
595.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
300W
250 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
DG1
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Generation 12.1
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
12 nm
Process Size
10 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
Unknown
200 mm²
Die Size
95 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.4
© 2025 - TopCPU.net