NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 vs AMD FireStream 9270
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1050 and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1455MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 160W)
AMD FireStream 9270 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 112.1GB/s)
160 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1050
+55%
1.862 TFLOPS
FireStream 9270
1.2 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2016
Release Date
Nov 2008
GeForce 10
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1354 MHz
Base Clock
-
1455 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
112.1GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
10
5
SM Count
-
640
Shading Units
800
40
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
46.56 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
58.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.00 GTexel/s
29.10 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1.862 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1200 GFLOPS
58.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
240.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
160W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GP107
GPU Name
RV770
GP107-300-A1
GPU Variant
RV770 XT
Pascal
Architecture
TeraScale
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
55 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
4.1
