Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTS 260M vs AMD Radeon E9260 MXM

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 260M vs AMD Radeon E9260 MXM

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 260M and 4GB VRAM Radeon E9260 MXM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 260M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (38W vs 50W)
AMD Radeon E9260 MXM 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
800 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTS 260M
0.264 TFLOPS
Radeon E9260 MXM +714%
2.15 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2009
Release Date
Sep 2016
GeForce 200M
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1090 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
57.60GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s

Render Config

12
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
14
96
Shading Units
896
32
TMUs
48
8
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

4.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.20 GPixel/s
17.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
57.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.150 TFLOPS
264.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.150 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
134.4 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT215
GPU Name
Baffin
N10E-GS
GPU Variant
Baffin PRO
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.727 billion
Transistors
3 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Board Design

38W
TDP
50W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy