Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 vs ATI Radeon X1550 PCI

NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 vs ATI Radeon X1550 PCI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 and 256MB VRAM Radeon X1550 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (9.600GB/s vs 4.256GB/s)
16 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon X1550 PCI 's Advantages
More VRAM (256GB vs 128GB)
Lower TDP (27W vs 50W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Jan 2007
GeForce 9
Generation
Radeon R500 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
600 MHz
Memory Clock
266 MHz

Memory

128MB
Memory Size
256MB
DDR2
Memory Type
DDR2
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
9.600GB/s
Bandwidth
4.256GB/s

Render Config

2
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
16
Shading Units
-
8
TMUs
4
4
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

2.356 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.808 GPixel/s
4.712 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.808 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
44.86 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
RV516
GT218-670-B1
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
R500
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
40 nm
Process Size
80 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
0.107 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Board Design

50W
TDP
27W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
3.3
OpenGL
2.1
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy