NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
880 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3
0.045 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6
+6231%
2.849 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2012
Release Date
Apr 2020
GeForce 9
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1410 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
600 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
128MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
9.600GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
2
SM Count
14
16
Shading Units
896
8
TMUs
56
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.356 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
4.712 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
44.86 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT218
GPU Name
TU117
GT218-670-B1
GPU Variant
TU117-300-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
7.5
4.1
Shader Model
6.6
