NVIDIA GeForce 920MX vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Max-Q
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce 920MX and 4GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 920MX 's Advantages
Lower TDP (16W vs 75W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 4% (1035MHz vs 993MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 920MX
0.508 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Max Q
+943%
5.299 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2016
Release Date
May 2021
GeForce 900M
Generation
GeForce 30 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
965 MHz
Base Clock
735 MHz
993 MHz
Boost Clock
1035 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
20
256
Shading Units
2560
24
TMUs
80
8
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
7.944 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
33.12 GPixel/s
23.83 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
82.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.299 TFLOPS
508.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.299 TFLOPS
15.89 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
82.80 GFLOPS
Board Design
16W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM108
GPU Name
GA107
N16V-GMR1-S
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
Unknown
Transistors
8.7 billion
Unknown
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
