NVIDIA GeForce 920MX vs NVIDIA GeForce MX110
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce 920MX and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX110 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 920MX 's Advantages
Lower TDP (16W vs 30W)
NVIDIA GeForce MX110 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 1% (1006MHz vs 993MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (40.10GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 920MX
0.508 TFLOPS
GeForce MX110
+1%
0.515 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce 920MX
382
GeForce MX110
+19%
458
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
GeForce 920MX
108
GeForce MX110
109
OctaneBench
GeForce 920MX
10
GeForce MX110
+40%
14
Graphics Card
Mar 2016
Release Date
Nov 2017
GeForce 900M
Generation
GeForce MX(1xx)
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4
Clock Speeds
965 MHz
Base Clock
978 MHz
993 MHz
Boost Clock
1006 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
40.10GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
256
Shading Units
256
24
TMUs
16
8
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
7.944 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.048 GPixel/s
23.83 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
16.10 GTexel/s
-
-
-
508.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
515.1 GFLOPS
15.89 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
16.10 GFLOPS
Board Design
16W
TDP
30W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM108
GPU Name
GM108S
N16V-GMR1-S
GPU Variant
N16V-GMR1-S-A2
Maxwell
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
1.02 billion
Unknown
Die Size
77 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
5.0
5.1
Shader Model
6.7 (5.1)
