NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS vs Intel Arc A380M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM GeForce 9200M GS and 6GB VRAM Arc A380M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS 's Advantages
Lower TDP (13W vs 35W)
Intel Arc A380M 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2000MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
1016 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 9200M GS
0.022 TFLOPS
Arc A380M
+18518%
4.096 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Jan 2023
GeForce 9M
Generation
Alchemist
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.1)
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1550 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
96bit
11.20GB/s
Bandwidth
186.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
1
SM Count
-
8
Shading Units
1024
4
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
128
-
RT Cores
8
-
-
-
16 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
2.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.192 TFLOPS
22.40 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.096 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1024 GFLOPS
Board Design
13W
TDP
35W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
G98
GPU Name
DG2-128
NB9M-GE
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Tesla
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
