NVIDIA GeForce 8400M GS vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM GeForce 8400M GS and 16GB VRAM RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 8400M GS 's Advantages
Lower TDP (11W vs 150W)
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1680MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
9712 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 8400M GS
0.026 TFLOPS
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2
+125630%
32.69 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2007
Release Date
Mar 2023
GeForce 8M
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-I
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
930 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1680 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
2
SM Count
76
16
Shading Units
9728
8
TMUs
304
4
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
304
-
RT Cores
76
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
64 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
188.2 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
510.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
32.69 TFLOPS
25.60 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.69 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
510.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
11W
TDP
150W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G86
GPU Name
AD103
NB8M-GS
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
45.9 billion
127 mm²
Die Size
379 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.9
4.0
Shader Model
6.8
