NVIDIA GeForce 410M vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 410M and 16GB VRAM RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 410M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (12W vs 150W)
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1680MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
9680 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 410M
0.11 TFLOPS
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2
+29618%
32.69 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2011
Release Date
Mar 2023
GeForce 400M
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
930 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1680 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
1
SM Count
76
48
Shading Units
9728
8
TMUs
304
4
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
304
-
RT Cores
76
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
64 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.148 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
188.2 GPixel/s
4.592 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
510.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
32.69 TFLOPS
110.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.69 TFLOPS
9.176 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
510.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
12W
TDP
150W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF119
GPU Name
AD103
N12M-GS
GPU Variant
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
45.9 billion
79 mm²
Die Size
379 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.8
