NVIDIA GeForce 410M vs NVIDIA GeForce MX130
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 410M and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX130 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 410M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (12W vs 30W)
NVIDIA GeForce MX130 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1189MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (40.10GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
336 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 410M
0.11 TFLOPS
GeForce MX130
+730%
0.913 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce 410M
72
GeForce MX130
+784%
637
Graphics Card
Jan 2011
Release Date
Nov 2017
GeForce 400M
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1109 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1189 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
40.10GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
1
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
384
8
TMUs
24
4
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.148 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.512 GPixel/s
4.592 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
28.54 GTexel/s
-
-
-
110.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
913.2 GFLOPS
9.176 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
28.54 GFLOPS
Board Design
12W
TDP
30W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF119
GPU Name
GM108
N12M-GS
GPU Variant
N16S-GTR-A1
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
Unknown
79 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
5.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
