NVIDIA GeForce 410M vs NVIDIA GeForce MX330
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 410M and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX330 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce MX330 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1594MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (56.06GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
336 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (10W vs 12W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 410M
0.11 TFLOPS
GeForce MX330
+1012%
1.224 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce 410M
72
GeForce MX330
+1372%
1060
Graphics Card
Jan 2011
Release Date
Feb 2020
GeForce 400M
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1531 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1594 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1752 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
56.06GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
1
SM Count
3
48
Shading Units
384
8
TMUs
24
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.148 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
25.50 GPixel/s
4.592 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.26 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
19.13 GFLOPS
110.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1224 GFLOPS
9.176 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
38.26 GFLOPS
Board Design
12W
TDP
10W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF119
GPU Name
GP108
N12M-GS
GPU Variant
GP108-655-A1
(N17S-G3-A1)
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
1.8 billion
79 mm²
Die Size
74 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
