NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition vs Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM GeForce 320M Mac Edition and 0 VRAM Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (23W vs 65W)
Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2200MHz
848 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 320M Mac Edition
0.091 TFLOPS
Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile
+4231%
3.942 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2010
Release Date
Dec 2023
GeForce 300M
Generation
Arc Graphics-M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
Ring Bus
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
300 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2200 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Dependent
Bandwidth
Render Config
-
-
-
4
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
896
16
TMUs
56
8
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.80 GPixel/s
7.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
123.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.885 TFLOPS
91.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.942 TFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
23W
TDP
65W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
C89
GPU Name
Meteor Lake GT1
MCP89
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Xe-LPG
-
Foundry
Intel
40 nm
Process Size
10 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
Unknown
100 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.6
