NVIDIA GeForce 210 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 and 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 210 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 70W)
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
2800 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 210
0.039 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+30669%
12 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce 210
285
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+2758%
8147
Graphics Card
Oct 2009
Release Date
Feb 2024
GeForce 200
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1620 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2130 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
2
SM Count
22
16
Shading Units
2816
8
TMUs
88
4
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
88
-
RT Cores
22
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.2 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
187.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.00 TFLOPS
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.00 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
187.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
31W
TDP
70W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x VGA
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT218
GPU Name
AD107
GT218-300-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
8.9
4.1
Shader Model
6.7
