NVIDIA GeForce 210 vs Intel Arc A750
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 and 8GB VRAM Arc A750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 210 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 225W)
Intel Arc A750 's Advantages
Released 13 years late
Boost Clock2400MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
3568 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 210
0.039 TFLOPS
Arc A750
+44002%
17.2 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce 210
285
Arc A750
+4269%
12453
Graphics Card
Oct 2009
Release Date
Oct 2022
GeForce 200
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2050 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2400 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
3584
8
TMUs
224
4
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
28
-
-
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
268.8 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
537.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
34.41 TFLOPS
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
17.20 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
2.150 TFLOPS
Board Design
31W
TDP
225W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x VGA
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GT218
GPU Name
DG2-512
GT218-300-A2
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.6
