Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 210 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT

NVIDIA GeForce 210 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce 210 Rev. 2 and 128MB VRAM GeForce 9400 GT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 210 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 128GB)
Lower TDP (31W vs 50W)
NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (9.600GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 210 Rev. 2 +34%
0.039 TFLOPS
GeForce 9400 GT
0.029 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2009
Release Date
Aug 2008
GeForce 200
Generation
GeForce 9
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
128MB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
9.600GB/s

Render Config

2
SM Count
2
-
Compute Units
-
16
Shading Units
16
8
TMUs
8
4
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB

Theoretical Performance

2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.836 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.672 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
29.38 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
G86
GT218-325-B1
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
80 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²

Board Design

31W
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
1.1
4.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy