NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI vs NVIDIA TITAN Ada
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 PCI and 48GB VRAM TITAN Ada to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 800W)
NVIDIA TITAN Ada 's Advantages
Boost Clock2520MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.15TB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
18416 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 210 PCI
0.035 TFLOPS
TITAN Ada
+265328%
92.9 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2009
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 200
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2235 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2520 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
48GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6X
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
1.15TB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
2
SM Count
144
16
Shading Units
18432
8
TMUs
576
4
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
144
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
96 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.900 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
483.8 GPixel/s
3.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1452 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
92.90 TFLOPS
35.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
92.90 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1452 GFLOPS
Board Design
31W
TDP
800W
200 W
Suggested PSU
1200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
2x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
GT216
GPU Name
AD102
-
GPU Variant
AD102-450-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
8.9
4.1
Shader Model
6.8
