Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI vs ATI FirePro V8800

NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI vs ATI FirePro V8800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 PCI and 2GB VRAM FirePro V8800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 208W)
ATI FirePro V8800 's Advantages
Released 6 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
1584 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 210 PCI
0.035 TFLOPS
FirePro V8800 +7442%
2.64 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Oct 2009
Release Date
Apr 2010
GeForce 200
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
147.2GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
20
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
1600
8
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.900 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
3.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
66.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
35.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.640 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
528.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

31W
TDP
208W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GT216
GPU Name
Cypress
-
GPU Variant
Cypress XT GL
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.0
© 2025 - TopCPU.net