NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI vs AMD FireStream 9250
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 PCI and 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
Lower TDP (31W vs 150W)
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (63.55GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
784 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 210 PCI
0.035 TFLOPS
FireStream 9250
+2757%
1 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2009
Release Date
Jun 2008
GeForce 200
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
993 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
63.55GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
10
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
800
8
TMUs
40
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.900 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
3.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
35.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
31W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GT216
GPU Name
RV770
-
GPU Variant
RV770 PRO
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
4.1
