NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI vs NVIDIA CMP 30HX
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 PCI and 6GB VRAM CMP 30HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 125W)
NVIDIA CMP 30HX 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
1392 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 210 PCI
0.035 TFLOPS
CMP 30HX
+14262%
5.027 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2009
Release Date
Feb 2021
GeForce 200
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x4
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1530 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
6GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
192bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
336.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
2
SM Count
22
16
Shading Units
1408
8
TMUs
88
4
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.900 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
85.68 GPixel/s
3.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
157.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.05 TFLOPS
35.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.027 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
157.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
31W
TDP
125W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GT216
GPU Name
TU116
-
GPU Variant
TU116-100-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
7.5
4.1
Shader Model
6.8
