NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI vs NVIDIA CMP 40HX
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 PCI and 8GB VRAM CMP 40HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 185W)
NVIDIA CMP 40HX 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
2288 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 210 PCI
0.035 TFLOPS
CMP 40HX
+21622%
7.603 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2009
Release Date
Feb 2021
GeForce 200
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x4
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1470 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
2
SM Count
36
16
Shading Units
2304
8
TMUs
144
4
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
288
-
RT Cores
36
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.900 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
105.6 GPixel/s
3.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
237.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
15.21 TFLOPS
35.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.603 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
237.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
31W
TDP
185W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GT216
GPU Name
TU106
-
GPU Variant
TU106-100-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
7.5
4.1
Shader Model
6.8
