NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI vs NVIDIA A30 PCIe
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 PCI and 24GB VRAM A30 PCIe to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 165W)
NVIDIA A30 PCIe 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1440MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
3568 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 210 PCI
0.035 TFLOPS
A30 PCIe
+29385%
10.32 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2009
Release Date
Apr 2021
GeForce 200
Generation
Tesla Ampere
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
930 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1440 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
24GB
DDR2
Memory Type
HBM2e
64bit
Memory Bus
3072bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
933.1GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
2
SM Count
56
16
Shading Units
3584
8
TMUs
224
4
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
224
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
24 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.900 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
138.2 GPixel/s
3.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
322.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.32 TFLOPS
35.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.32 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
5.161 TFLOPS
Board Design
31W
TDP
165W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
GT216
GPU Name
GA100
-
-
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
8.0
4.1
Shader Model
N/A
