NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI vs Intel Arc A380
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 PCI and 6GB VRAM Arc A380 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 75W)
Intel Arc A380 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
1008 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 210 PCI
0.035 TFLOPS
Arc A380
+11894%
4.198 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2009
Release Date
Jun 2022
GeForce 200
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2050 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
6GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
96bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
186.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
1024
8
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
128
-
RT Cores
8
-
-
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.900 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.60 GPixel/s
3.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
131.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.397 TFLOPS
35.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.198 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1050 GFLOPS
Board Design
31W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GT216
GPU Name
DG2-128
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.6
