AMD FireStream 9370 vs AMD Radeon R7 250
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FireStream 9370 and 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9370 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1088 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 250 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 4 months late
Lower TDP (55W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9370
+268%
2.64 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 250
0.717 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2010
Release Date
Oct 2013
FireStream
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
20
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
1600
Shading Units
512
80
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.20 GPixel/s
66.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
22.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.640 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
716.8 GFLOPS
528.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
44.80 GFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
55W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Cypress
GPU Name
Cape Verde
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.1
