AMD FireStream 9370 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 Core 512
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FireStream 9370 and 1536MB VRAM GeForce GTX 480 Core 512 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9370 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 134.4GB/s)
1088 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (225W vs 375W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9370
+144%
2.64 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 480 Core 512
1.078 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2010
Release Date
Unknown
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
134.4GB/s
Render Config
20
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
16
1600
Shading Units
512
80
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.86 GPixel/s
66.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
33.73 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.640 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1078 GFLOPS
528.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
225W
TDP
375W
550 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Cypress
GPU Name
GF100
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
GF100-ES-DT1-A2
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.0
5.0
Shader Model
5.1
