AMD FireStream 9370 vs NVIDIA NVS 300
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FireStream 9370 and 512MB VRAM NVS 300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9370 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
1584 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 300 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
Lower TDP (18W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9370
+6669%
2.64 TFLOPS
NVS 300
0.039 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2010
Release Date
Jan 2011
FireStream
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
12.64GB/s
Render Config
20
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
1600
Shading Units
16
80
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.080 GPixel/s
66.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.160 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.640 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
39.36 GFLOPS
528.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
225W
TDP
18W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DMS-59
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Cypress
GPU Name
GT218
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
GT218-670-B1
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
5.0
Shader Model
4.1
