AMD FireStream 9370 vs NVIDIA GeForce 210 Rev. 2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FireStream 9370 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce 210 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9370 's Advantages
Released 8 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
1584 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 210 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9370
+6669%
2.64 TFLOPS
GeForce 210 Rev. 2
0.039 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2010
Release Date
Oct 2009
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
20
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
1600
Shading Units
16
80
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.080 GPixel/s
66.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.160 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.640 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
39.36 GFLOPS
528.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
225W
TDP
31W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x VGA
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Cypress
GPU Name
GT218
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
GT218-325-B1
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
5.0
Shader Model
4.1
