AMD FireStream 9370 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FireStream 9370 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9370 's Advantages
704 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 147.2GB/s)
Lower TDP (80W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9370
2.64 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116
+7%
2.849 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2010
Release Date
Jul 2020
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1410 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
20
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
1600
Shading Units
896
80
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
66.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
2.640 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
528.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
80W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Cypress
GPU Name
TU116
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
TU116-150-KA-A1
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.0
Shader Model
6.6
