AMD FireStream 9370 vs AMD FirePro S9150
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FireStream 9370 and 16GB VRAM FirePro S9150 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9370 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 235W)
AMD FirePro S9150 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 147.2GB/s)
1216 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9370
2.64 TFLOPS
FirePro S9150
+92%
5.069 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2010
Release Date
Aug 2014
FireStream
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s
Render Config
20
Compute Units
44
-
-
-
1600
Shading Units
2816
80
TMUs
176
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.60 GPixel/s
66.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
158.4 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.640 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.069 TFLOPS
528.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.534 TFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
235W
550 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Cypress
GPU Name
Hawaii
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
Hawaii GL44
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.3
