AMD FireStream 9350 vs NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 and 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2250MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
3680 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9350
2.016 TFLOPS
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation
+1042%
23.04 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2010
Release Date
Mar 2023
FireStream
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1725 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2250 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
432.0GB/s
Render Config
18
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
40
1440
Shading Units
5120
72
TMUs
160
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
160
-
RT Cores
40
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
22.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
144.0 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
360.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
23.04 TFLOPS
2.016 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.04 TFLOPS
403.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
360.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
100W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Cypress
GPU Name
AD104
Cypress PRO GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
5.0
Shader Model
6.7
