Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9350 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 GM206

AMD FireStream 9350 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 GM206

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 750 GM206 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
928 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 GM206 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1239MHz
Lower TDP (60W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9350 +58%
2.016 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 750 GM206
1.269 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2010
Release Date
Nov 2015
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1087 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1239 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
18
Compute Units
-
1440
Shading Units
512
72
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

22.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
39.65 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.65 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.016 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1269 GFLOPS
403.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
39.65 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
GM206
Cypress PRO GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
60W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.2
5.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy