AMD FireStream 9350 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GTX
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 9600 GTX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 44.80GB/s)
1344 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GTX 's Advantages
Lower TDP (140W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9350
+625%
2.016 TFLOPS
GeForce 9600 GTX
0.278 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2010
Release Date
May 2009
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 9
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
44.80GB/s
Render Config
18
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
12
1440
Shading Units
96
72
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
22.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.280 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
27.84 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.016 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
278.4 GFLOPS
403.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
150W
TDP
140W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Cypress
GPU Name
G92
Cypress PRO GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
5.0
Shader Model
4.0
