AMD FireStream 9350 vs NVIDIA NVS 510
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 and 2GB VRAM NVS 510 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
1248 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 510 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 4 months late
Lower TDP (35W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9350
+558%
2.016 TFLOPS
NVS 510
0.306 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2010
Release Date
Oct 2012
FireStream
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.51GB/s
Render Config
18
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
1440
Shading Units
192
72
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
22.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.188 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.75 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.016 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
306.0 GFLOPS
403.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
12.75 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
35W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Cypress
GPU Name
GK107
Cypress PRO GL
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
5.0
Shader Model
5.1
