AMD FireStream 9350 vs NVIDIA GeForce 210
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
Released 8 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
1424 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 210 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9350
+5069%
2.016 TFLOPS
GeForce 210
0.039 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2010
Release Date
Oct 2009
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
18
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
1440
Shading Units
16
72
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
22.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.080 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.160 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.016 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
39.36 GFLOPS
403.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
150W
TDP
31W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x VGA
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Cypress
GPU Name
GT218
Cypress PRO GL
GPU Variant
GT218-300-A2
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
5.0
Shader Model
4.1
