AMD FireStream 9350 vs NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 and 48GB VRAM RTX 5880 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 285W)
NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2460MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (864.0GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
12640 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9350
2.016 TFLOPS
RTX 5880 Ada Generation
+3336%
69.27 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2010
Release Date
Jan 2024
FireStream
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
975 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2460 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
864.0GB/s
Render Config
18
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
110
1440
Shading Units
14080
72
TMUs
440
32
ROPs
176
-
Tensor Cores
440
-
RT Cores
110
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
72 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
22.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
433.0 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1082 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
69.27 TFLOPS
2.016 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
69.27 TFLOPS
403.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1082 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
285W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
Cypress
GPU Name
AD102
Cypress PRO GL
GPU Variant
AD102
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
5.0
Shader Model
6.7
