AMD FireStream 9350 vs ATI FirePro V4900
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
960 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V4900 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9350
+162%
2.016 TFLOPS
FirePro V4900
0.768 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2010
Release Date
Nov 2011
FireStream
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
18
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
1440
Shading Units
480
72
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
22.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.400 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.016 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
768.0 GFLOPS
403.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
150W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Cypress
GPU Name
Turks
Cypress PRO GL
GPU Variant
Turks XT GL
TeraScale 2
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.0
