AMD FireStream 9350 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
672 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1032MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (144.2GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (134W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9350
+27%
2.016 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
1.585 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2010
Release Date
Mar 2013
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
980 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1032 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
144.2GB/s
Render Config
18
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
1440
Shading Units
768
72
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
384 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
22.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.51 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
66.05 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.016 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.585 TFLOPS
403.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
66.05 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
134W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Cypress
GPU Name
GK106
Cypress PRO GL
GPU Variant
GK106-240-A1
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
2.54 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
221 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
5.0
Shader Model
5.1
