AMD FireStream 9350 vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 and 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 300W)
AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
2656 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9350
2.016 TFLOPS
FirePro S9300 X2
+296%
7.987 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2010
Release Date
Mar 2016
FireStream
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
18
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
1440
Shading Units
4096
72
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
22.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
249.6 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.016 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
403.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
499.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
300W
450 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Cypress
GPU Name
Capsaicin
Cypress PRO GL
GPU Variant
Capsaicin XT
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.0
