AMD FireStream 9350 vs ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 and 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
1360 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9350
+2420%
2.016 TFLOPS
FirePro 2460 Multi View
0.08 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2010
Release Date
Apr 2010
FireStream
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s
Render Config
18
Compute Units
1
-
-
-
1440
Shading Units
80
72
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
22.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.016 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
403.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
150W
TDP
17W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Cypress
GPU Name
Cedar
Cypress PRO GL
GPU Variant
Cedar GL
TeraScale 2
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
59 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.0
