AMD FireStream 9350 vs ATI FireGL V8600
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 and 1024MB VRAM FireGL V8600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 111.1GB/s)
1120 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 159W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9350
+358%
2.016 TFLOPS
FireGL V8600
0.44 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2010
Release Date
May 2007
FireStream
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
868 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR4
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
111.1GB/s
Render Config
18
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
1440
Shading Units
320
72
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
22.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.01 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.01 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.016 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
440.3 GFLOPS
403.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
150W
TDP
159W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Cypress
GPU Name
R600
Cypress PRO GL
GPU Variant
R600 V8600
TeraScale 2
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
80 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
4.0
