AMD FireStream 9350 vs AMD Radeon R7 250E
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 and 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 250E to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 72.00GB/s)
928 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 250E 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
Lower TDP (55W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9350
+146%
2.016 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 250E
0.819 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2010
Release Date
Dec 2013
FireStream
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1125 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
72.00GB/s
Render Config
18
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
1440
Shading Units
512
72
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
22.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.80 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.016 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
819.2 GFLOPS
403.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
51.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
55W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Cypress
GPU Name
Cape Verde
Cypress PRO GL
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.1
